SO WHAT'S
WRONG WITH CONDOS? Well, it all starts with the Developer
December 12, 2008
Charles HanesUnless you are particularly lucky or
have a buyers agent that knows all of the Developers in the city, your troubles
usually start right here! Take it from someone who has fought these guys for decades! Even
when Ive managed to win the disputes and the lawyers draw up Settlement Agreements,
they always make sure verbiage to minimum standard is always included.
Oh, they woe you with the sexiest sales/presentation centers with all of the colourful
presentation material and beautiful model suites and friendly sales staff to assist
you, (ya right!). Understand that they are agents with the express legal
requirement to protect ONLY the best interests of their
client (the developer/Seller). You are considered under law a
Customer of theirs and they owe you only minimal legal obligation, (like
dont lie, but answer any/all questions but they cant offer negative
information as that would contradict their fiduciary with their client).
If you are buying into a presale condominium you will have to know how to get people who
are trying to end-run you to be straight and believe me, with most developers this is a
challenge at best!
After almost three decades in this business Im confident that Im not
exaggerating when I say Ive pretty well seen it all! Notice that I say, pretty
well, as Im aware that there is always a new frontier out there ahead of us,
but during my almost 30 years in the Toronto
condo market there really hasnt been a lot that has gotten by me.
I really was spoiled when I entered the condo business. Way back in 1980 I was a freelance
sales trainer, (this was before being an entrepreneur was considered a good
thing), and was called in to a meeting by the marketing manager, (who had just
attended one of my sales seminars), of the then famous Reichmann Family (who had just
built First Canadian Place but were failing with their mixed used Queens Quay
Terminal/Residences on the harbour).
The condo industry itself was brand new as the Ontario Government had just introduced this
new phenomena (residential condos) to the real estate industry. A simple
change of wording in the law and voila, apartments could be individually deeded properties
and could be presold before they were even built!
The rest is history! Ive been directly and indirectly in the sales and marketing of
Toronto residential condos ever since. Oh, Ive balanced this demanding work schedule
with my interests in the arts, managing a successful music business, rock/business video
business and television production company on the side.
All of these disciplines culminated in this web site where we bring you all of the details
on all of the condos, all of the time. Not everyone always likes what I have to say, but
that is understandable as I no longer work on behalf of the developers. Seven years ago I
got a real estate license and became Torontos pioneer buyer agent (a new concept where the
buyer actually receives professional representation to face the professional
representation retained by developers).
I enjoy somewhat a love hate relationship with Toronto developers due to my website being
so popular around the world and the high quality of my traffic (condo buyers
looking for meaningful information to assist them in their efforts to invest their hard
earned money in this specialty field).
If I could only discourage buyers from going out on their own and walking into condo sales
sites and being sold condos. As someone who was known as the king cobra in the
condo sales site business, known for my ability to get you to buy a condo (oh, you could
cancel when you got home but you bought when you were there thanks to my high pressure
selling tactics) I can tell you first hand that you dont have a chance!
The amazing thing to me is that our services are FREE and 80% of all
buyers use the Internet to start their search yet so many get caught up in the
developers shuffle game by entering the negotiations without adequate council. |
|
|
Understand that the
sales person for the developer is legally their Agent which means that they
owe a fiduciary obligation (legal obligation to ONLY their Client
the Developer to protect ONLY their best interests. As a Buyer, dont you want the
same level of skill at the negotiating table?
Apparently not as the line ups of buyers at condo sales sites continue to jostle for
position to be first to buy, which bewilders me with developers sales people
applying hysteria selling tactics being well employed totally disregarding the
facts that show that this is simply not the time to invest in condos.
My experience with developers in Toronto shows that the significant majority of Toronto
developers consistently deliver inferior product! The greatest majority of condo buildings
in this city leave a great deal to be desired.
Many developers are pawning off substandard workmanship at excessively inflated prices.
With an amazing majority of Toronto downtown condo developments selling over $600 per
square foot (more likely $800/sq.ft.) while delivering conventional 8 foot ceiling
heights, hollow core doors, stipple ceilings, etc. is just downright dumb to me! But line
up an buy they do!
This tells the developers that they can get away with delivering modest product at top
buck thus their sharp knives comes out and they pare down their delivery to the demand!
Even before the crazy jump in downtown prices (from $400 - $800 in a couple years) The Hudson (for example) at Spadina and King Street
launched at approximately $315 per square foot. A one bedroom plus den 750 square foot
unit sold for $235,000 (roughly) with parking $25,000 and a locker $3,500. I put 38 buyers
into The Hudson while at the same
time putting none into the towers of College Park. College Park I and College Park II were a little
more costly per square foot. Good question, why did my client/buyers buy at Hudson instead of College Park I and College Park II?
Much of the logic was visual but most people cant even tell when they inspect the
model suite! For example, both developments had models but neither had an actual ceiling
in the model suite. Oh, they had a good excuse but the truth is that the model looks and
feels a lot larger when there is a 12 foot ceiling.
College Park I and II both had only 8 foot
ceiling heights on the bottom 20 25 floors. Buyers paid an escalation fee $1,500 -
$2,500 per floor per unit all the way up thus, to get a 9 foot ceiling (Hudson had 9 foot ceilings
throughout) buyers faced an additional $25,000 or so for the same sized suite.
The bad news of buildings with 8 foot ceilings part way up and then 9 foot ceilings from a
given floor to a given floor is that when the building is being resold, Realtors
dont know that there are 9 foot ceilings above such a floor so they see a couple of
the 8 footers on the lower floors and the building is branded as an 8 foot ceiling
building, even though you bought the 9 foot ceiling heights. Its just not sound
investing.
The critical differences
between College Park and
The Hudson were found in
Density. College
Park had hundreds of small suites in two 45 + storey buildings that were targeted at
investor/buyers while Hudson was
a single building of balanced suites targeted at end users.
Most significantly, Hudsons
one plus den units had 2 bathrooms whereas College Park offered only one
bathroom or at best 1 ½ (no good for visitors).
Good developers get their buildings registered quickly, minimizing Occupancy
Fees while others take months and months (15 18 is not unheard of) and all of
these costs factor into your end game. Knowledge of previous conduct of developers is Holy
Grail of the condo industry and is something that you will not find published anywhere.
Thats why smart investors use me. Not just any Realtor will do as Developers work
specifically with Realtors as Co-Operating Realtors meaning that they work as
agents for the developer thus taking care of ONLY the developers best interests. Be
sure to know who you are working with and who they are representing. With me, its
you, only you!Be sure to tune in each week to read
this Series:
1.
Whats Wrong With Condos . . . . It all starts with the developer.
2. Whats Wrong
With Condos . . . . Board of Directors.
3. Whats Wrong
With Condos . . . . Property Manager.
4. Whats Wrong
With Condos . . . . Tenants.
5. Whats Wrong
With Condos . . . . Speculator/Investors.
6. Whats Wrong With Condos . . . . End User Owners.
Thats it for now. Im Charles Hanes |